Are our laws on freedom of speech fit for purpose in the age of “cancel culture”?
How would you improve or reform our current system for group litigation and other civil proceedings involving multiple parties?
Forum non conveniens: Is Spiliada still fit for purpose or holed below the water-line?
Are there any circumstances (and if so what are they) in which the Court may refuse to give effect to contractual provisions on the ground of repugnancy? Should the Court have such a power?
Does the availability of an illegality defence depend on the scope of the duty owed?